|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mme Pinkerton
United Engineering Services
   |
Posted - 2010.09.19 21:51:00 -
[1]
so maybe now you can tell us:
what have you been doing for the last year?
how long did it take the staff to get a decent asset valuation after Ricdic's theft? for how long did you try to rebuild EBANK before deciding on liquidation? how many man-hours have been spent by EBANK staff on this project since the freezing of accounts? what happens to the retained staff wages, what about wages for employees that were hired after the freeze? will the liquidation be overseen by a 3rd party? What is going to happen to OOG EBANK assets (website & infrastructure, operating procedures/knowledge, ...)? Will there be any efforts to sell off these assets (for ISK) as part of the liquidation process?
|
Mme Pinkerton
United Engineering Services
|
Posted - 2010.09.20 15:18:00 -
[2]
One thing I don't understand is:
just a few days ago you made a big point out of not allowing the sale of EBANK balances, even between verified accounts; now you present us a system which seems to encourage exactly this behavior (as you cannot control what happens to the shares once they are issued).
care to enlighten me on that sudden switch of opinion?
PS: I would understand this if the reasoning had been "we don't allow the sale of account balances at this point in time as we are planning to roll out our own system for this sort of transactions" but the argument was "sale of account balances won't ever be allowed because it is bad".
|
Mme Pinkerton
United Engineering Services
|
Posted - 2010.10.11 05:03:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Thrasymachus TheSophist
Ever notice there is no investment market in Somalia
o rly?
|
Mme Pinkerton
United Engineering Services
|
Posted - 2010.11.20 17:18:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Issaiah Mustafa
WHen is the t-shirt coming out?
"They said I'd get my ISK after buying this shirt."
|
Mme Pinkerton
United Engineering Services
|
Posted - 2010.11.29 06:56:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Mme Pinkerton on 29/11/2010 07:03:24
Originally by: Kalrand
That sounds a bit higher than what I had in mind.
He's only acting in the best interests of his depositors.
Clearly, no sale > sale at a price he doesn't like.
edit: If Ray thinks that the range he quoted is a realistic valuation of the EBANK website (which doesn't really matter in the situation at hand as selling it for even 1 ISK would be better for EBANK'S creditors than not selling it at all), Mr. Horizontal has my full sympathies (and 90b wouldn't have been more than a token amount for compensation of his work).
|
|
|
| |
|